Skeptipundit - Critical Thinking About Politics and Science

<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d24499757\x26blogName\x3dSkeptipundit\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLACK\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://skeptipundit.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://skeptipundit.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-7084556048017977399', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

The Least Surprising Scientific Result of the Year

From a report at BBC.com:

"Catching sight of a pretty woman really is enough to throw a man's decision-making skills into disarray"

1 Comments on "The Least Surprising Scientific Result of the Year"
Maybe the finding is unsurprising, but testing hypotheses (even so-called "no-brainers") remains an integral part of science. Without testing with empirical evidence our subjective biases would be left unchecked... Anonymous @ Sun Apr 23, 09:09:00 AM EDT: Post a comment

<< Skeptipundit Main Page

Skeptipundit
AT gmail DOT com

Amazon Honor System